Zing: Exploiting Program Structure for Model Checking Concurrent Software
نویسندگان
چکیده
Model checking is a technique for finding bugs in systems by systematically exploring their state spaces. We wish to extract sound models from concurrent programs automatically and check the behaviors of these models systematically. The zing project is an effort to build a flexible infrastructure to represent and model check abstractions of large concurrent software. To support automatic extraction of models from programs written in common programming languages, zing’s modeling language supports three facilities present in modern programming languages: (1) procedure calls with a call-stack, (2) objects with dynamic allocation, and (3) processes with dynamic creation, using both shared memory and message passing for communication. We believe that these three facilities capture the essence of model checking modern concurrent software. Building a scalable model-checker for such an expressive modeling language is a huge challenge. zing’s modular architecture provides a clear separation between the expressive semantics of the modeling language, and a simple view of zing programs as labeled transition systems. This separation has allowed us to decouple the design of efficient model checking algorithms from the complexity of supporting rich constructs in the modeling language. zing’s model checking algorithms have been designed to exploit existing structural abstractions in concurrent programs such as processes and procedure calls. We present two such novel techniques in the paper: (1) compositional checking of zing models for message-passing programs using a conformance theory inspired by work in the process algebra community, and (2) a new summarization algorithm, which enables zing to reuse work at procedure boundaries by extending interprocedural dataflow analysis algorithms from the compiler community to analyze concurrent programs.
منابع مشابه
Context-Bounded Model Checking of Concurrent Software
The interaction among concurrently executing threads of a program results in insidious programming errors that are difficult to reproduce and fix. Unfortunately, the problem of verifying a concurrent boolean program is undecidable [24]. In this paper, we prove that the problem is decidable, even in the presence of unbounded parallelism, if the analysis is restricted to executions in which the n...
متن کاملDeciding Assertions in Programs with References
Modular analysis of procedures using summaries is a key technique to improve scalability of software model checking. Existing software model checkers do not fully exploit procedural structure for modular analysis. In the SLAM project, modular analysis using procedure summaries is done on a Boolean Program model, which contains only boolean types. We extend Boolean Programs to include reference ...
متن کاملExploiting Object Escape and Locking Information in Partial-Order Reductions for Concurrent Object-Oriented Programs
Explicit-state model checking tools often incorporate partial-order reductions to reduce the number of system states explored (and thus the time and memory required) for verification. As model checking techniques are scaled up to software systems, it is important to develop and assess partial-order reduction strategies that are effective for addressing the complex structures found in software a...
متن کاملSymmetry-Aware Predicate Abstraction for Shared-Variable Concurrent Programs (Extended Technical Report)
Predicate abstraction is a key enabling technology for applying finite-state model checkers to programs written in mainstream languages. It has been used very successfully for debugging sequential system-level C code. Although model checking was originally designed for analyzing concurrent systems, there is little evidence of fruitful applications of predicate abstraction to shared-variable con...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2004